Friday, June 24, 2005

Timeline

Title: Timeline
Author: Michael Crichton

Michael Crichton is one of those authors whose sci-fi works are simply brilliant (Jurassic Park series) but, as a result of terrible screenplay, the movie sucked a little bit. (Probably because of the dialogue and the casting). I'd like to say sorry first if I mixed up the movie and the book because I found both interesting.

The story started when an old man wearing a brown robe was stranded in the hot desert, but he suffered from hypothermia, which was very uncanny. Much worse, the x-ray reports indicated that his veins and bones, although in tact, were not in place, as if it was teared up and being put back again. He had no idea how he got there, and the only thing that they found on him was a blueprint of a monastery (Mon. Ste. Mere), which meant Monastery of Saint Mother in French. Later, it turned out that the monastery existed, but in 1357 near Castelgard, France. And the man's name was Traub, an employee of International Technology Company (ITC), founded by a Bill Gates- wannabe, Robert Doniger.

At the same time, a group of archaelogists led by Professor Edward Johnston was excavating a site where the French and the English army warred each other during the Hundred-Year war. If it sounded familiar, the place was Castelgard, France, and one of the team members, Kate Erickson, was processing the Monastery site. Not a coincidence, but the project was also funded by Robert Doniger, the ITC founder.

Prof. Johnston's team also included his son, Chris, who was rather smitten with Kate, Andre Marek the Scotsman, Francois Dontelle the Frenchman, and a physics expert David Stern. Prof. Johnston was curious at why Doniger was so eager to fund the project and gave him too much information as if it landed from the sky or something. He decided to go to New Mexico to talk to Doniger.

While he was gone, Kate discovered a hole under the spot she was working on and realized that it was an underground room in the monastery. In the room, she found some documents and a stone carving which was ruined badly. When Stern processed the documents, he was dumbstruck to find Prof. Johnston's writing on one of them. It dated 1357. Panicking, the group decided to question Robert Doniger and flew to New Mexico.

When they got there, they met Frank Gordon and Steven Kramer, Doniger's right hand men. They were even shocked to know that Doniger sent Johnston and Gordon to Castelgard 1357, and Gordon actually left Johnston alone. Now, the group's job is to go there, find the prof and return, through a revolutionary machine which works like a fax-machine (that is, by tearing up the electron particles of a body and putting them back together again.) Actually, the machine was meant to be a super fast posting machine that could send a package from point a to point b in seconds. But, they had no idea why they were sent to the past. The only thing that could bring them back was a marker with a button which they could press to return to the future. While Stern was against the idea, the others decided they had to save the professor. Frank Gordon, and his two sidekicks joined the crowd, as guides, since they did the traveling too many times already. THere were a few rules: They had to be back beofre 6 hours, and they were not allowed to bring any modern weapons.

Unfortunately, this trip was going to be different from Gordon's past trips. They went back on the day where the French attacked the English's stronghold La Roque, and brought it down. Worse, the English wrongly attacked them (they thought that they were the French spies). One of Gordon's men was shot by arrows and pressed the marker to return home. Even worse, he brought grenades with him. When he returned to the future, the grenades blew, thus ruining the machine. This meant that if the others were to return, it might not happen until the ITC employees fixed the machine. Doniger was very mad. It may be that even if they managed to save the professor, they might not be able to go back.

During this trip, the group had to go through lots of grueling things of living through the medieval times. Innocent lives were taken, and an unlikely romance that wasn't really supposed to happen bloomed between one of them and a French Dame. There were many plot twisters, including a former ITC employee who was betrayed, and lots of other interesting things that were never shown in the movies. Will the course of history change? With their interruption, will the English win the war instead of the French?

If you saw the movie, you better pick this book up.
If you haven't seen the movie, pick this book up first before laughing at the movie.

7 comments:

~The Urban Factor~ said...

I haven't get the chance to read Timeline..but Michael Crichton is among my fave authors (besides JohnGrisham and Jeffrey Archer)...And Tom Clancy is definitely not my thing...coz i hate all those war stories of his...Anyway, have u read "the Great Train Robbery" by Crichton???It was one of the best crime novel of all time,seriously..u'd be captivated to read how these criminals mind work...and it's based on a true story!...Maybe i'll write the review next week after i come back from the training...till then...cheerio!

KyleWorthington said...

Well...I'll look 4ward to it (cuz Crichton is good -- but the movies sucked) and yeah...I'm not into Clancy (aiyaa...very boring oo). But yeah, I also liked John Grisham and James Patterson (but it's so weird when Grisham wrote "Skipping Christmas", and Patterson wrote "Suzanne's Diary for Nicholas". Do you think so?

~The Urban Factor~ said...

Yeah!yeah!i totally agree with u!!And me and my dad are like totally "in luv" with Grisham...but both of us agreed that "the painted house" is like among his worst novel. Grisham's novel nowadys are not as captivating as it was before :-(...but i'm still continuing to be his ardent fan... :-)

Ayu Ikhwani said...

Baizurah and John Grisham.. asyik cakap pasal pak cik tu je.. anyway, I was talking with one of my 'kakak²' here and just like you, Sentot, we think the Painted house is one of his worst..

Kak Zai: Bacaaaa.. then tetiba dah abis.. takde climax or anything!!

But then again, you can't really expect an author to write best sellers aje.. once in a while, I'm sure they'd love the change

KyleWorthington said...

My favorite Grisham books are "The Runaway Jury", "The Client", and "The Street Lawyer". Others are good also, but the three are my favorites. But, last time I read Grisham latest book "The Summons" and I gave up. "The Painted House"? *sighs...what is he trying to tell us actually?*

Ayu Ikhwani said...

U-huh! Looks like Painted House really sucks then hehe..

Well, I've never chosen books because of its authors, half of the time I don't even know the authors hehe.. I usually look at the best sellers but eversince I've expanded this blog, I seems to find so mcuh more interesting books that I haven't looked up.. you guys are to blame if I ever run outta money bcoz of this book business hahah..

KyleWorthington said...

well, actually i've been looking up books by authors, bestsellers list, and movie-tie ins. And John Grisham's latest book that I read is not 'The Summons', I meant to write *the latest Grisham book that I read*. Sorry!